Connect with us

News Agregator

Euro 2020: Russia’s staging of games under threat after Wada recommends ban


Russia

Euro 2020: Russia’s staging of games under threat after Wada recommends ban

St Petersburg was confirmed as a Euro 2020 host city in 2014Russia’s staging of games at Euro 2020 could be under threat after a World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) committee recommended the country be banned from hosting sports events for four years.Russia could also be banned from next year’s Tokyo Olympics — having also been excluded…

Euro 2020: Russia’s staging of games under threat after Wada recommends ban

Euro 2020 St Petersburg logo

St Petersburg was confirmed as a Euro 2020 host city in 2014

Russia’s staging of games at Euro 2020 could be under threat after a World Anti-Doping Agency (Wada) committee recommended the country be banned from hosting sports events for four years.

Russia could also be banned from next year’s Tokyo Olympics — having also been excluded from the 2018 Winter Games — and other major competitions.

Wada’s compliance review committee (CRC) recommended a raft of measures after declaring the Russian Anti-Doping Agency (Rusada) non-compliant over inconsistencies in anti-doping data.

One of the proposals is to withdraw the right to host an event already awarded unless it’s «legally and practically impossible».

St Petersburg, Russia’s second-largest city, is a venue for Euro 2020 group games and a quarter-final tie — a fixture potentially involving England.

Wada’s executive committee will consider the recommendations and make the final decision at a meeting in Paris on 9 December.

The CRC made its recommendations based «in particular» on a forensic review of inconsistencies found in some of the data obtained by the agency from the Moscow Laboratory in January 2019.

The committee concluded that there is «an extremely serious case of non-compliance with the requirement to provide an authentic copy of the Moscow data, with several aggravating features».

CRC’s «strong proposed consequences» include:

  • Russia may not host, or bid for or be granted the right to host any major events for four years
  • Russia may not bid for the right to host the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games, irrespective of whether the bidding takes place during or after the four-year period
  • The country’s flag may not be flown at any major event staged in the four-year period
  • Russian athletes and their support personnel may only participate in major events staged in the four-year period where they are able to demonstrate that they are not implicated in any way by the non-compliance. In such circumstances these athletes would compete as neutrals
  • Where the right to host a major event in the four-year period has already been awarded to Russia, the signatory must withdraw that right and re-assign the event to another country, unless it is legally or practically impossible to do so

The four-year period would start «on the date on which the decision that Rusada is non-compliant becomes final».

Real Life. Real News. Real Voices

Help us tell more of the stories that matter

Become a founding member

US Anti-Doping Agency head Travis Tygart said: «It’s great the CRC has recognised the egregious conduct of Russia toward clean athletes and now let’s all hope the Wada executive committee uses the same resolve to ensure clean athletes are not again sold down the river and actually supports this unfortunate but necessary outcome.»

Rusada was initially declared non-compliant in November 2015 after a Wada-commissioned report by sports lawyer Professor Richard McLaren alleged widespread corruption that amounted to state-sponsored doping in Russian track and field athletics.

A further report, published in July 2016, declared Russia operated a state-sponsored doping programme for four years across the «vast majority» of summer and winter Olympic sports.

In 2018, Wada reinstated Rusada as compliant after the national agency agreed to release data from its Moscow laboratory from the period between January 2012 and August 2015.

However, positive findings contained in a version courtesy of a whistleblower in 2017 were missing from the January 2019 data, which prompted a new inquiry.

Subscribe to the newsletter news

We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Top Stories

To Top